Mapped types on tuples and arrays #
In TypeScript 3.1, mapped object types[1] over tuples and arrays now produce new tuples/arrays, rather than creating a new type where members like push()
, pop()
, and length
are converted.
For example:
type MapToPromise<T> = { [K in keyof T]: Promise<T[K]> };
type Coordinate = [number, number]
type PromiseCoordinate = MapToPromise<Coordinate>; // [Promise<number>, Promise<number>]
MapToPromise
takes a type T
, and when that type is a tuple like Coordinate
, only the numeric properties are converted.
In [number, number]
, there are two numerically named properties: 0
and 1
.
When given a tuple like that, MapToPromise
will create a new tuple where the 0
and 1
properties are Promise
s of the original type.
So the resulting type PromiseCoordinate
ends up with the type [Promise<number>, Promise<number>]
.
Properties declarations on functions #
TypeScript 3.1 brings the ability to define properties on function declarations and const
-declared functions, simply by assigning to properties on these functions in the same scope.
This allows us to write canonical JavaScript code without resorting to namespace
hacks.
For example:
function readImage(path: string, callback: (err: any, image: Image) => void) {
// ...
}
readImage.sync = (path: string) => {
const contents = fs.readFileSync(path);
return decodeImageSync(contents);
}
Here, we have a function readImage
which reads an image in a non-blocking asynchronous way.
In addition to readImage
, we’ve provided a convenience function on readImage
itself called readImage.sync
.
While ECMAScript exports are often a better way of providing this functionality, this new support allows code written in this style to “just work” TypeScript.
Additionally, this approach for property declarations allows us to express common patterns like defaultProps
and propTypes
on React function components (formerly known as SFCs).
export const FooComponent = ({ name }) => (
<div>Hello! I am {name}</div>
);
FooComponent.defaultProps = {
name: "(anonymous)",
};
[1] More specifically, homomorphic mapped types like in the above form.
Version selection with typesVersions
#
Feedback from our community, as well as our own experience, has shown us that leveraging the newest TypeScript features while also accommodating users on the older versions are difficult.
TypeScript introduces a new feature called typesVersions
to help accommodate these scenarios.
When using Node module resolution in TypeScript 3.1, when TypeScript cracks open a package.json
file to figure out which files it needs to read, it first looks at a new field called typesVersions
.
A package.json
with a typesVersions
field might look like this:
{
"name": "package-name",
"version": "1.0",
"types": "./index.d.ts",
"typesVersions": {
">=3.1": { "*": ["ts3.1/*"] }
}
}
This package.json
tells TypeScript to check whether the current version of TypeScript is running.
If it’s 3.1 or later, it figures out the path you’ve imported relative to the package, and reads from the package’s ts3.1
folder.
That’s what that { "*": ["ts3.1/*"] }
means - if you’re familiar with path mapping today, it works exactly like that.
So in the above example, if we’re importing from "package-name"
, we’ll try to resolve from [...]/node_modules/package-name/ts3.1/index.d.ts
(and other relevant paths) when running in TypeScript 3.1.
If we import from package-name/foo
, we’ll try to look for [...]/node_modules/package-name/ts3.1/foo.d.ts
and [...]/node_modules/package-name/ts3.1/foo/index.d.ts
.
What if we’re not running in TypeScript 3.1 in this example?
Well, if none of the fields in typesVersions
get matched, TypeScript falls back to the types
field, so here TypeScript 3.0 and earlier will be redirected to [...]/node_modules/package-name/index.d.ts
.
Matching behavior #
The way that TypeScript decides on whether a version of the compiler & language matches is by using Node’s semver ranges.
Multiple fields #
typesVersions
can support multiple fields where each field name is specified by the range to match on.
{
"name": "package-name",
"version": "1.0",
"types": "./index.d.ts",
"typesVersions": {
">=3.2": { "*": ["ts3.2/*"] },
">=3.1": { "*": ["ts3.1/*"] }
}
}
Since ranges have the potential to overlap, determining which redirect applies is order-specific.
That means in the above example, even though both the >=3.2
and the >=3.1
matchers support TypeScript 3.2 and above, reversing the order could have different behavior, so the above sample would not be equivalent to the following.
{
"name": "package-name",
"version": "1.0",
"types": "./index.d.ts",
"typesVersions": {
// NOTE: this doesn't work!
">=3.1": { "*": ["ts3.1/*"] },
">=3.2": { "*": ["ts3.2/*"] }
}
}